I greatly appreciate the Journal covering the decision of the Board of Supervisors to pursue a state grant to purchase land at the Kirk Ranch. You correctly reported that I voted against this use of taxpayer's money, but your story was incomplete. I did say the property was "already protected" and "the public is getting absolutely nothing for it." I also explained it was already zoned at one house per every 20 acres. This existing limit on future land development insures there is "no jeopardy - no impact" to be feared upon the blue oak woodlands at that site.  It is a "gift of public [state] funds" for which the public gets nothing. Moreover, the county taxpayer, like the state taxpayer (you and me), will match the state from county mitigation or general funds. It's a sweet deal for property owners who give up nothing, but gain at the expense of taxpayers.

I have since learned that percolation studies in this area reveal an impermeable volcanic cap providing few leech fields for septic tanks and low prospects for any development. Hence, the building code adds to existing zoning code protection.  It appears that for this property the taxpayer may pay above market value when compared to area listings and sales in the public record. Once purchased there will be no public use or access other than for the current owner.

I repeat, "The public is getting nothing for it." I repeat it is a "gift of public funds."

Thanks for reporting on this important issue to taxpayers.

Bruce Kranz, Supervisor 5th District